Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clench (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 03:34, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clench (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored after a PROD deletion via REFUND, but still doesn't appear to have any third-party sources that show any notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 21:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- clearly. This is yet another hopeless Transformers trivia article. Vague snippets of trivia "sourced" to toy catalogues and primary sources, and seems to contain a fair bit of original research judging by the way the character is described as being "presumably" this and "presumably" that. Reyk _YO! 01:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- poor notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability. Character has only been important in one story if I recall correctly. NotARealWord (talk) 06:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. --Khajidha (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent, significant coverage in relible sources. AniMate 19:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unless, of course, someone can produce a reliable source. --Divebomb (talk) 12:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others. Clearly non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:16, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.