Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clementi Primary School (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Clementi, Singapore#Education. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clementi Primary School[edit]

Clementi Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN primary school. We don't generally retain stand-alone articles of such schools, absent substantial non-routine non-local coverage that is not present here. Tagged for notability for over a year. Epeefleche (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 06:28, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 08:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 08:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The topic is notable. We generally do not delete articles about such respectable schools. Andrew (talk) 12:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Contra, see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Just asserting that "we generally do" something that we do not generally do does not establish notability. Please note as well the comments by others at this and other ongoing school AfDs. --Epeefleche (talk) 06:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
the topic has no inherent notability, therefore that is a weak argument for keeping. If it was inherently notable everyone would be voting keep. LibStar (talk) 03:51, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.