Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clebo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 06:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clebo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a manual yutsi (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NOT. article seems to be promotional. RadManCF (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Spam. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 21:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 13:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. New board game, no coverage. Had spammy language. Did not squarely fit as G11, and there's no A7 for it, but the sooner it's gone, the better. Pcap ping 13:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spam RadioFan (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete might qualify as a speedy. Hobit (talk) 03:26, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.