Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clear Coffee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clear Coffee[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the CSD G11 nomination on the basis that the article isn't a blatant advertisement. There's some media attention but given that the company is a brand new startup, it seems unlikely to be notable. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and lacks reliable sources, possibly because it is too new. The media sources look remarkably similar, as though they were all quoting from or paraphrasing the same press release. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete launch PR is not evidence of notability also WP:NOTPROMO. SmartSE (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.