Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTrial
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 04:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ClearTrial[edit]
- ClearTrial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly non notable COI spam; see the user page for the article's creator, Nfitzmaurice (talk · contribs).
Most of the refs in the article either appear to be: primary, podcasts with person from the subject, or brief mentions. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 19:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm seeing lots of press releases, but not independent coverage. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply the discussion runs for 7 days. It is clear from your userpage that you have a direct commercial interest in this product/company. OSborn arfcontribs. 19:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WTF are you talking about? I do believe you have me mistaken for the person you linked to, which isn't me. Also, I was agreeing with your nomination. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I was replying to a comment which was apparently later removed. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, that explains it. Bad form. He shouldn't have removed it, and simply struck it instead. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I was replying to a comment which was apparently later removed. OSborn arfcontribs. 18:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WTF are you talking about? I do believe you have me mistaken for the person you linked to, which isn't me. Also, I was agreeing with your nomination. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:57, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yet another integrated system for clinical operations planning, forecasting, outsourcing, and project tracking. This apparently has to do with tracking clinical drug tests for pharmaceutical companies, but for some reason they just can't allow themselves to say so in English. Claims to minimal significance are only non-notable mutual admiration awards from trade associations. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- non-notable business; only references provided are PR news releases. Dialectric (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.