Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clean Energy Ministerial (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Again, lack of participation. Nobody cares about ministerials, it seems... Sandstein 17:15, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Energy Ministerial[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to prove notability. The sources used in the article are primary or otherwise unreliable sources. First AfD was closed as no consensus for lack of participation. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:58, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confessing I have not read the article, scanning it, I find it surprising it would be targetted for AfD. WP is littered with pages which are complete trash and stay there whereas this one describes an important multilateral body/talkshop, is a serious page on a serious subject (not some third-rate footballer in Outer Mongolia) and an effort has been made to source it. In the context of so much that needs deleting, this one definitely stays, in my view. sirlanz01:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:44, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.