Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Sean Horton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 08:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clayton Sean Horton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reference only mentions him in passing, nothing substantive. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ as it stands right now, only one source provided.--TV Man 13 23:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and WP:SIGCOV. The only reference mentions him in passing. This is the ultimate up and coming creative person who helps other up-and-coming artists. Bearian (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 00:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears only someone with a good career as artist/entrepreneur, not yet notable.FigureArtist (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per both Johnbod (talk) 03:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.