Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clay Oliver Hill (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clay Oliver Hill[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD seven years ago was closed as no consensus essentially because it was determined that the person actually existed. No sources were presented there, nor could I find any now. Searches for "clay oliver hill" -wikipedia and "populist democratic viking party" -wikipedia are just returning noise. Not that we have any prejudice against stunt candidates, but they still need to meet WP:GNG. Vermin Supreme this guy ain't. --BDD (talk) 18:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. --BDD (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment [1] provides a good source. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. He's just an unsuccessful, fringe candidate who barely rates a mention here and there.[2] Clarityfiend (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yes, per nom.Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.