Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clay A. Griffith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clay A. Griffith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no significant coverage. fails WP:GNG LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable. Article completely sourced to IMDb which is not reliable. No significant independent press coverage. Cowlibob (talk) 13:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete IMDb is not enough alone to establish an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He was nominated for "Excellence in Production Design for a Feature Film, Contemporary Films" in the Art Directors Guild awards[1] and he's mentioned in passing in a few reviews, interviews and articles on film[2][3][4][5], all of which offers some evidence of achievement and status, but I don't think that's enough to meet WP:CREATIVE, and with no in-depth coverage he fails WP:BASIC. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.