Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClayClaim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of independent reliable sources to support notability. RL0919 (talk) 22:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ClayClaim[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. There is no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. See the talk page where the creator argues for notability based on subscriber count. Note also that a YouTube Creator Award is based on subscriber count and does not confer notability. --Pontificalibus 12:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. --Pontificalibus 12:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. --Pontificalibus 12:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:53, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Searches revealed no sources of note. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.