Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudio D. Zivic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:40, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio D. Zivic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to passing mentions, name checks and quotations. The primary sources in the article and found in searches do not serve to establish notability. The one independent source in the article only provides a name check. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:18, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 15:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A significant portion of this article is not actually about the subject or his work at all. That said, the sources listed in the article are either not independent (Church News, Ensign, lds.org, Liahona), trivial mentions (Deseret News), not reliable ("Grampa Bill"), or primary (quotes from a speech in the blog Meridian Magazine), so they don't establish notability under WP:GNG. Search finds passing mentions of ceremonial duties like opening a temple or short quotes from speeches, some apparently in Deseret News but actually produced by the official Church News staff. Having a name or a quote in an article is not WP:SIGCOV. It's trivial. So subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Open to alternatives if significant coverage emerges. Bakazaka (talk) 03:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.