Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Zacchara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neıl ☎ 10:58, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Zacchara[edit]

Non-notable fictional character just introduced into a soap, General Hospital, last Thursday. No history and no background for the character exists. Previously redirected to main soap page in accordance to soap project for minor characters but that seems to not be working. Article does not meet notability for fiction and includes nothing but possible spoilers. KellyAna (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I've repaired this AfD listing. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable fictional character. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Character is on contract therefore will be notable, also questioning nomination as the editor has a vendetta --KingMorpheus (talk) 22:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Just because an actor is on contract doesn't mean the character will end up being notable. KellyAna (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Sarah Brown was an integral part of General Hospital when she played the original Carly. She's supposed to be on the show for at least another year to play out the Claudia Zacchara storyline. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.145.9.20 (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to comment - what Sarah Brown did before is not relevant to the article in discussion. She's not notable enough to have a page yet. It seems the reason people want her to have a page is because of what she may do and who's playing her. Neither of which are legitimate reasons to have an article. The character has no notability to speak of at this point in time. IrishLass (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The character may or may not become notable but at this time they certainly aren't. Article is also full of unverified information that claims to be "confirmed" but no sources listed. IrishLass (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per KingMorpheus--72.229.214.90 (talk) 22:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the article needs references and third-party sources. And I don't think that a few weeks on a day-time soap opera qualifies as notability within itself. --Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 08:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.