Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Florentino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I think there is just about concensus to delete here, certainly the extra week didn't bring any other significant sources to light. Fenix down (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Florentino[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was sent to draft for good reason but has been moved back to main space without going through AfC.

Contested PROD with reason 50 starts for a team indicates some sort of notability

Initial reason for PROD was Not notable enough for an article; when searching Spanish news sources, there is only brief coverage of her signing for Real Madrid. No WP:SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG. No evidence that Florentino passes WP:NFOOTBALL either as she has no caps.

I have done a WP:BEFORE search and checked the Spanish and German Wikipedia and still found no strong coverage. Spiderone 18:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes the WP:GNG per [1] [2] [3] [4] and there is more. gidonb (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only decent source is the first one, in my view. The rest is just routine transfer rumours or transfer announcements Spiderone 09:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rest also includes WP:SIGCOV. As I said there is more but this is sufficient for the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 11:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts, sorry? I can see that they confirm the agreed price was 20 000 euros to Albacete. Another source confirms that she is a centre back and says that she is fast. I wouldn't be opposed to this being sent back to draft again and going through AfC. It shouldn't really have been moved back, in my opinion and I'll be surprised if it would pass even with these sources added. Spiderone 11:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spiderone, please note that all four articles were signed by journalists. Routine articles are often assigned to press agencies. Here actual people went into such detail as analyzing the actual playing style of Claudia Florentino! An article should be kept once we know that WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV exist. I did not dig into the other players that you nominated, but it is my experience that female players in prime leagues often meet the WP:GNG. Probably it is time to review our notability rules for top-level female footballers. Until then we should assess closely if they pass the WP:GNG. gidonb (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would still probably lean more towards restoring this in the draft space rather than main space but we may have to agree to disagree. In any case, the Spanish league is joining WP:FPL as of next season so players such as Florentino will soon achieve the presumed notability at NFOOTBALL provided she stays in this league. Spiderone 18:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Evidence or some coverage, but this is really just one substantial article, the other sources provided are very short routine transfer reporting of what looks like the same event. Given low level of participation to date no harm in extending for another week to generate wider consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFOOTBALL failure. Number 5 7 15:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.