Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Doumit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article completely fails to establish any notability, and no significant, independent coverage is evident in the sources. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Doumit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor, Fails GNG and NACTOR. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 20:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the actress fails GNG, but I'm not sure she fails NACTOR. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 10:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet the guidelines for actors, there are too few roles and not enough are significant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject is a cast member on a current NBC television series, Timeless. See [1] and [2] for recent interviews with her. Her current IMDb StarMeter ranking is within the top 5,000 of all of the 7 million+ people listed in the database. I would give the subject the benefit of the doubt as to notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Draft as an acceptable compromise considering her career is not yet substantiated, only having the 1 major work, so this will suffice, considering IMDb is enough to gauge her works, but there's currently nothing for actual substantial notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Metropolitan90, or at least redirect to Timeless (TV series) to keep a link. SST flyer 14:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.