Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Claire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Claire[edit]

Claudia Claire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Best spanish porn actress is clearly not enough when that is literally all there is to say. Fails pornbio anf gng Spartaz Humbug! 11:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No biographical content or nontrivial reliable sourcing. Exactly why a Czech performer is given a trophy as "Best Spanish Actress" is hardly explained, but it does indicate that these aren't really significant awards. Events like this one are very likely to limit their awards to performers who appear and promote the event. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- the award is not significant & GNG is not met. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.