Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Bermúdez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Bermúdez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and WP:BASIC. Apparently the daughter of a famous Nicaraguan general, but notability is not inherited. Kurykh (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unelected candidates for political office do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates per se — if she doesn't have a strong and properly sourced claim of notability for some other reason independent of her candidacy, then she has to win the election, not just run in it, to be deemed notable because of the election itself. But this makes no credible claim of preexisting notability, and is referenced nowhere close to well enough to claim that she passes WP:GNG in lieu — and notability is not inherited, so she's not special just because of who her father happens to be, either. Bearcat (talk) 18:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unelected candidates for US congress are not notable for that alone, and Bermudez has no other claims to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is mention of her in the article on her father, which is probably enough.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, are you saying that it's enough in the sense that it justifies an article about her in and of itself, or that it's enough in the sense of being all we need to maintain? Bearcat (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.