Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude J. Kelly III
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete and redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. RL0919 (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Claude J. Kelly III[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Claude J. Kelly III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Public defenders are not inherently notable, and there is not enough to suggest he passes WP:GNG. Redirecting to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies, where his WP:BLP1E is listed, makes sense. Let'srun (talk) 11:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Louisiana. Let'srun (talk) 11:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - not enough coverage in reliable independent sources. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Notability not shown in article. A search found no wide coverage to back up notability. Fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:BASIC.AuthorAuthor (talk) 16:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete & redirect per nominator as article creator. Safiel (talk) 18:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.