Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classicism in Meitei culture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Meitei culture as a natural ATD. Owen× 23:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Classicism in Meitei culture[edit]

Classicism in Meitei culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS PepperBeast (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and History. Skynxnex (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Meitei culture (possibly with more wl to other daughter pages there) given that there are other pages including Ancient Meitei literature which seem to cover the material in a better way. Agree that there seems to be too many pages covering the same ground on this topic JMWt (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Merge. Just too many unnecessary pages on Meitei culture and like many others this too doesn’t need to have its own separate article when there is already page on Meitei culture. Least, some content of it can be merged to Meitei culture page. RangersRus (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep : I have provided different sources of books in English and Indian languages, which support the claims. This topic is highly underrated one. So, obviously, it might not appear in Google search (English version) in abundance. --Haoreima (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.