Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Class Skills (World of Warcraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MERGE into Classes in World of Warcraft. The raw totals are 9 Delete, 2 Keep, 4 Merge. Merge preserves the material, so collapse that into 9 Delete the material, 6 Keep the material in some form. That alone is not enough of a statistical edge to make a deletion a no-brainer. The argumentation is about equal. Therefore, no consensus to delete, defaults in this case to merge, since most of the Keep-the-material comments were to merg. Most of the merge votes were to merge the material. A couple of the Merge votes were to merge the material into the separate articles for each class, but these seem not to exist, so I merged into Classes in World of Warcraft. Herostratus 15:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Class Skills (World of Warcraft)[edit]

Game guide. Delete just like Warcraft III units and structures (AFD) and many more. Punkmorten 08:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Daveydweeb (^chat/_patch) 09:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete TJ Spyke 09:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Not a guide, doesnt tell the player how to play, just lists skills. Has the nominator actually read this, its not guiding anything, this is as basic as telling someone the rook moves vertically and horizontally. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 10:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Disarm- this skill disarm the target, greatly reducing the targets melee attack damage and producing aggro., your telling me that doesn't read like a game guide?--Andeh 11:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, it reads like a game mechanics description - a game guide differs from this, in that it would detail the use of game mechanics, normally introducing POV. Seems like we need a formal description of a game guide to me. LinaMishima 02:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Saying a Rook moves horizontally and diagonally is not a game guide, hence stating disarm does XYZ is not a game guide. Stating a good time to disarm is when and it can be used in conjunction with skill Z is a gameguide. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 15:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, blatant game guide/fancruft.--Andeh 11:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Peephole 11:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I suppose next they'll just paste the whole manual into an article. Recury 19:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh no, only excerpts from it. That way it's still fair use. :) Garrett^Talk 23:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Warcruft. Garrett^Talk 23:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge details into the associated WoW class articles LinaMishima 02:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The skill lists could easily be merged into the associated WoW class articles. Hyde_v 20:28, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep or merge it is to basic to read as a game guide and if you guys think it reads too much like a game guide, why doesnt someone edit it so it doesn't. However i do agree about merge it into the respective class pages. --Comicdude 12:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zer0faults --Pinkkeith 23:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wholly indistinguishable from a manual excerpt, how-to file, or GameFAQs page. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 19:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Listcruft, burn it with fiar. Axem Titanium 01:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. See WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of information. +Fin- 16:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.