Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClarkHuot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ClarkHuot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the sources indicate notability, and given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClarkHuot/Cocoon, it seems unlikely other sources can be found. Another AfD in the WP:AN#Expewikiwriter mess; which now has new users removing prods (such as on this article), just to make it extra annoying. Anyway, fails WP:CORP, and also has issues with WP:NOTADVERT, given it was created by a paid account. 86.** IP (talk) 12:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was initially not sure, but the only remotely decent sources are the first three, and looking at them more closely they are clearly all a hashed out remix of the same press release. Searches in gbooks and gnews turn up nothing. Considering that, there is no way the "multiple sources" requirement of WP:CORP is met (I'm treating all three as one) and therefore it should be deleted. As I imagine that CH may be watching this at some point, have a read/join CREWE. SmartSE (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nonnotable and as per previous AFD. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.