Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claires Court School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Nom should read WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMEA & make himself familiar with all of that (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Claires Court School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since June 2006. If deleted, then Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2006 will become empty. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This 55 year old school educates about 1000 students up to age 18. According to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, we almost always keep referenced articles about secondary schools. Perhaps we might delete if the article is a hoax or the topic is an obscure home school. Neither apply here. I have added two references to the article, so there is no need for deletion. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 23:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Category:Articles lacking sources from June 2006 can be deleted as this article does have sources. As indicated in WP:OUTCOMES, we keep all verified secondary schools and this one is no different. With the the large amount of local sources available [1] along with some national coverage that's already in the article, there's no question of the article's existence.--Oakshade (talk) 23:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 04:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep obviously, according to the precedent documented at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Nominator GeoffreyT2000 is possibly not aware of this and other topics of exceptionto the GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Since the school teaches up to the age of 18, it covers the Secondary School age group, where we normally allow articles. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:48, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. Clearly not unsourced either. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Keep - Per common outcomes. --TTTommy111 (talk) 06:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.