Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civic data science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:38, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Civic data science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delte Nor I. Vague discussion of a vague concept. DGG ( talk ) 01:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems to be a possible synonym for urban informatics, a notable field for which we have no article. The term itself does not seen to have wide use--no GScholar hits at all. But I don't think this article is of high enough quality that it would merit a move to urban informatics, nor does it merit a redirect to community informatics. I'm left with delete. --Mark viking (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.