Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citylight.net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 01:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citylight.net[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable? Edgars2007 (Talk/Contributions) 17:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 02:27, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Per coverage in trustworthy governmental sources:

"Telemetrica Ltd". Investment and Development Agency of Latvia. Retrieved February 24, 2012.
"Export and Innovation Award 2010: Pride of the Latvian Economy". Investment and Development Agency of Latvia. 2010. Retrieved February 24, 2012.

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:12, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - First of all, the company is called Telemetrica and the product is Citylight Software. Secondly, the product was only nominated for a prize, not given one, even though they got recognition. What is missing are reliable third-party sources, preferably magazines or journals, with an article on the product and its notability. Lettonica (talk) 11:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well sure that's the name of the company. However, the reliable, tertiary sources in my !vote above cover the article's topic in detail. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:08, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 04:08, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.