Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Nord

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

City Nord[edit]

City Nord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with "ample reliable sources out there", but I was unable to find any. Seems to fail WP:GNG. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep at the moment there are three sources in the article from three separate news sources, which all discuss the shopping mall as a news item, not in trivial passing mention. Other recent news: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. An offline search in printed newspapers found half a dozen news items about the mall (again, not passing mention) just from the past week. With such an abundance of sources there is seems clear that the article passes WP:GNG. Arsenikk (talk) 22:45, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Passes WP:GNG per sources added to the article and upon a review of those presented above by User:Arsenikk. For more easily-found additional sources, select the Google News link at this header of this AfD discussion. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:01, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - when I first noticed that it was PRODed, I thought "if it's the biggest shopping mall in Nordland, it has to be notable". Fortunately, Arsenikk and Manxruler has done some work with the article to show why it is notable, and the sources presented in this AfD by Arsenikk is more than enough to pass WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.