Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Colts Cricket Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

City Colts Cricket Club[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small suburban cricket team in a small town (20,000) playing against other suburban teams in the small town's local league, well below state league-type standard. Insufficient sporting merit. No substantial independent coverage. Search gives just phonebook listings or routine info about upgrades to the local oval. Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There is some sustained long term coverage of the subject. I have not checked these but there are potentially over 800 references available here. The significant majority of these will be routine and-or minor and some not relevant, but even if only 1% are good references, there may be sufficient to support GNG. Looks like insufficient BEFORE was done. Aoziwe (talk) 10:30, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass the WP:NCRIC requirements for Australian club teams as this cricket club does not play at Grade Level. The above 800 hits on Trove are all likely to be passing mentions, such as scorecards, fixture announcements, community events ect. I can't see anything that satisifies wider GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCRIC and as StickyWicket states although there is some sourcing, I don't think there's enough there for a GNG pass. Not seeing a suitable WP:ATD either here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 13:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also fails WP:ORG for lack of third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.