Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citibank Philippines (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citibank Philippines[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable for standalone article, notability also fails to be established in the references. If there's any material worth merging, it could be merged to Citibank. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 07:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep. Though bank's operation in the country is notable still not sure about Keep or merge. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 12:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re. Is it though? How is there any notability of the bank specific to its operations in the Philippines? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 14:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs to be rewritten, Citi operates differently in different geos, hence merging with the main page may just be a generalisation of information. Having said that the article does need to be rewritten per Wiki guidelines. Belmond (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Belmond[reply]

Feel free to do so, provided references establishing notability of the banks operation in the Philippines are added. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Easy Keep - AFDs shouldn't be used to coerce other editors into improving articles. If someone wants an article improved then tag for improvement or even search Google Books and improve themselves. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the specific sources stating the notability of the bank's operation in the Philippines? Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 11:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you actually bothered searching (or searched more thoroughly), you'd run into this, this, this, this and this. Since obviously the bank is covered in a number of reliable third-party sources, I say Keep. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 05:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.