Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citébeur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citébeur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a significant French pornographic company that was instrumental with launch of a number of major pornographic actors and types of gay pornography not open before. This is adequately covered in the article with references. Notable porn star François Sagat, an iconic name in gay porn, was recruited by Citébeur and made his debut with them. Citébeur won consecutive Best Ethnic Film Awards at the PinkX Gay Video Awards in 2013, 2015 and 2016. werldwayd (talk) 14:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, including the references in the article. Saying that it was "instrumental" in the "launch" of major porno actors is not a valid reason as notability is not inherited. If the company was significant in some other way, then there should be references that say that. Finally, the PinkX awards from Pink TV are not significant since they are only based on pornographic films included on the channel's programming. Topic fails GNG and NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:16, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.