The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was dleete. DS 01:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly-spelt article consisting of advertising a website that fails WP:WEB (aeropagitica) 21:48, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Disavian 21:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete likely vanity, definite spam, horribly written, possible copy-vio. Gwernol 22:40, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. The guy even put a copyright notice at the end of the article. Seano1 22:54, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
