Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circleback Lending

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 22:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Circleback Lending[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. Most of the sources in the article fail WP:ORGING in particular Lend Academy which looks to be a P2P lending service site and Magnify Money which has an 'advertising disclosure' on the articles which says they get money from companies they feature. The RS like Bloomberg and Yahoo Finance only report funding and fail WP:ORGDEPTH. Jbh ^Talk 14:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as there hasn't been any more activity from the author suggesting it was a SPA and I'm not seeing much for better improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and SwisterTwister. Searches did not show up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.