Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinephotographer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to videographer. MBisanz talk 03:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Cinephotographer[edit]
- Cinephotographer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:NEO. Google only has 71 hits for cinephotographer+dslr, none of which strike me as RS-worthy. (Cinephotographer itself has many false positives for foreign filmmakers of traditional cinematographic background, albeit with poor translation skills into English.) References are fairly poor and arguably promotional in content, and the article essentially notes that people with new still cameras which can now record HD video are now "cinephotographers". Not saying that this may not merit further consideration in the future, but for now, the relevant information seems more appropriate for more general DSLR and cinematography articles. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with videographer. --TS 13:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to videographer. LK (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to cinematography or videographer as from the text of the article, that might seem where it might best belong. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.