Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cinematism[edit]
- Cinematism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A neologism that is based on one reliable source that says Quentin Tarantino writes scripts while listening to music. The term "cinematism" isn't used in the source and what is described in the article is not what Tarantino talks about in the source. The other two quotes are sourced to wikis, but again, they just say that Tarantino is inspired by music, not that he "creates cinematography with [his] mind using music". It appears this is a term made up by the author of the article, and is original research. Prod was contested, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 08:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:57, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom: neologism. No reliable sources.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:09, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The sources provided don't use this term to describe the activity under discussion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:12, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. For this definition, failed neologism and possibly fails as WP:OR. There does seem to be some coverage for this term in Paul Virilio's understanding of the word; e.g., see page 5 here. See also this Google Book search. However, as term under Virilio's understanding only really gets tossed around when Virilio's ideas are discussed, I think any WP coverage of it belongs within his article. Other uses of the word seem to be mostly various people's on-the-spot inventions, having various meanings related to the cinema. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 08:55, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.