Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincopa Ltd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cincopa Ltd[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD G4 declined as significantly different to previous version. Previous AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincopa. Still promotional, sources are press releases. Editing history suggest undisclosed paid editing. Vexations (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] G2 crowd is an aggregator of user reviews and not a reliable source
[2] HubSpot is not in independent source
[3] an alexa ranking does not establish notability
[4] onextrapixel is independent (according to them) but not reliable
[5] is by a huffpo contributor,dependent coverage that is not sufficient to establish notability:
[6] is a press release
[7] is routine coverage, does not establish notability
[8] is routine coverage, does not establish notability
[9] is a dead link
[10] is a how-to
[11] is a press release
[12] is a blog, not a reliable source
[13] SimilarTech provides a form of analysis, possibly a good source (have never seen it used as a source before)
[14] is a press release
[15] is a how-to
[16] is a press release
[17] is a press release
[18] is a how-to
[19] is a user review site
[20] is not independent

Vexations (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Likely a violation of PROMO as nominator mentions. Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant corporat advertising. With the number of IP socks removing speedy template and amount of bomb-tagging in the article so as to deceive casual observer; this article is self evident of its lack of notability. –Ammarpad (talk) 03:34, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the sources remain inadequate. DGG ( talk ) 16:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.