Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciaran Buckley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciaran Buckley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third-party sources indicate notability. (A page from the publisher of an author's book is not sufficient.) Danger (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source 1 says "He has worked as a client director with Fleishman-Hillard for the past two years. Prior to this, he was a journalist with the Sunday Business Post, RTÉ and the Irish Farmers Journal. He also held key positions with Microsoft from 1999 to 2001, including head of internet and technical communications." Much of this is mentioned in the article already... --can dle •wicke 02:51, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Source 2 is public service broadcaster RTÉ Radio — "On farmweek this week, the author of a new book "Strong Farmer", Ciaran Buckley, talks to Damien O Reilly" (see Programme 42: 26th October 2007). --can dle •wicke 02:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Source 3 is an event by Tipperary Libraries — "This event will feature Liberties Press Publisher Seán O’Keeffe, and writers Chris Ward and Ciaran Buckley speaking at Thurles Library on Tuesday, 09 October 2007 at 8pm." --can dle •wicke 02:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Source 4 simply proves he worked for the SBP. --can dle •wicke 03:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Source 5 shows he did go to Yale (first mention under "Technology" at the bottom of the page). --can dle •wicke 03:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Source 6 shows he worked for the IFJ. --can dle •wicke 03:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brief mentions in several sources is not sufficient to prove notability. Not everyone whose name is on the internet is notable. --Danger (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if we accept those sources as RS's, the author still fails notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing encyclopedic to say about the fellow. Abductive (reasoning) 01:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. ALthough there is coverage as linked above, the coverage is not significant.--Pink Bull 03:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.