Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chyld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. Having released just one album they fail WP:BAND and there are no compensating secondary sources. TerriersFan (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chyld[edit]

Fails WP:Music with no hope of redemption. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - With only one album released, I would tend to agree. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:19, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete This band doesn't meet any WP:MUSIC criteria, with a second album, no matter how big a failure it was, they would have. Oh well, this is not a band worth disputing that consensus over...--CastAStone /^/(talk) 15:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability. Terraxos (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.