Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chwee kway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Terence Ong 12:26, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Chwee kway[edit]
Non notable stub--Zxcvbnm 13:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep or transwiki It certainly exists. Since Singapore is a small place, it may not be common outside of there. Wikipedia isn't paper. Just because its esoteric or uncommon, doesn't mean it isn't notable. [[1]]
[[2]] [[3]] Roodog2k 14:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable food dish in Singapore. One of Singapore's favourite food dish for breakfast, definitely notable. --Terence Ong 16:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems notable dish of Singapore [4] [5] Gu 17:50, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The custom of eating steamed rice cakes for breakfast isn't notable enough for its own article. I also have doubts about whether the transliteration of the title is accurate. Brian G. Crawford 21:13, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Brian G. Crawford. Fishhead64 22:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable food. Might also be chwee kueh, but I won't pretend to know for sure. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 23:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Its more commonly known as Chwee kway. I will move it if the AFD result is keep. --Terence Ong 04:29, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It's Min Nan in origin, there's no strict transliteration rule unless we want to follow its Romanized orthography. --Sengkang 04:38, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, common and notable food dish in Singapore. --Sengkang 02:34, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Systemic bias does not justify a bad faith nomination. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 05:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per Natalinasmpf's comment.--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 07:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.