Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Churchill House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not noteable Rathfelder (talk) 22:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wow, the guy sure had a lot of houses! However, I can't find anything about a particular one at this location in Red Lion Square. The one that seems to be the most famous is at Hyde Park gate, and unless my map-reading skills are really bad, they can't be the same building. LaMona (talk) 23:26, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable, non-historic building. Appears to have been built in the past 20 years but is not of any particular significance. —Мандичка^YO 😜 02:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm simply seeing no obvious improvement. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; I can't find sources about the building's historicity or notability. It houses the Royal College, but all buildings house something, and that doesn't ipso facto mean notability. /wia /tlk /cntrb 14:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it's an undistinguished building housing a famous institution. No reason to give it an article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Perhaps there are offline sources, but I could find nothing to show the notability of this building online. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.