Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Members
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Church of the Members[edit]
Nonsense/hoax/unsourced. --W(t) 22:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Probably should have been {prod}. Just silliness. Carlo 22:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. Hoax Bige1977 22:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Hoax. Gwernol 01:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. per all above. Rockpocket 01:27, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. per all above. --Mboverload 01:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unverifiable. Not a speedy candidate however since hoaxes are not speedy candidates. Weyes did the right thing when bringing it here. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "It has come to the attention of the Saintly Members that their believers have been oppressed with respect to posting their beliefs on the wikipedia. While the Members are generally peaceful and loving, the rage they feel over the removal of their teachings from the wikipedia shall cause them to descend from the Blackcombs of British Columbia and bring forth chaos to all the oppressors." I think that says it all. Delete at any velocity, unless verified through the use of reliable sources. -- Saberwyn 07:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable. --ManiF 07:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unverifiable, hoax. --Terence Ong 10:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BALLS. Stifle 23:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Probably just looking for publicity. Article should be in uncyclopedia. Dessydes 09:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.