Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chunni Lal Vishen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chunni Lal Vishen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP since 2008, no reliable secondary sources. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:N. No coverage in secondary sources.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Simply non-notable. No sources, no coverage. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The lack of reliable sources make it impossible to write a decent bio. Kevin (talk) 00:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unable to find coverage in any reliable sources in order to verify the contents of the article. Without sources the article fails WP:BASIC so can't pass WP:PROF. —J04n(talk page) 01:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.