Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --File Éireann 22:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Chump[edit]

Neologism, possible hoax. None of the Google results have anything to do with the topic. King of Hearts | (talk) 04:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While being a "chump" is a common expression, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, Urban or otherwise. The definition and etymology provided are suspect at best ("chumpishness" doesn't seem like a cromulent word). Not worth a Transwiki. --Kinu 04:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic. EdGl 04:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's hardly a neologism (see A Chump At Oxford, the 1940 Laurel & Hardy film). However it does seem to be a dictdef so delete per Kinu. --kingboyk 06:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. While it is indeed an actual word, the information give is quite inaccurate. It could easily be rewritten. Royboycrashfan 09:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It is neither a neologism or a hoax being familiar to speakers of British English - although this is not made clear. However, I am not at all sure about the given definition. If it belongs anywhere, it is in wikidicitonry. 13:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary Prodego ^talk 14:35, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only because its just a definition. If it was expanded to encyclopedia-type content, I'll change to keep. This is why Wictionary was invented - • | ĐÜ§§§Ť | • ^{T | C} 21:54, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.