Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuka Ekweogwu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 05:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chuka Ekweogwu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in depth on subject matter and just passing mentions. WP:NACTOR not satisfied, generally it's WP:TOOSOON Edidiong (talk) 00:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He seems to have been the lead character in a major film.I think itwould have been fair for the nomination to have mentioned that. DGG ( talk ) 12:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has two prominent roles in feature films so passes WP:NACTOR criteria 1 (only one criteria needed), thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since subject fails WP:ACTOR. No harm reminding ourselves of its criteria : The persona must have had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions; or a large fan base or a significant "cult" following; or made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. None of them are met. The single claim to fame is the lead role in a film claimed to be a "major" one without evidence to that, and whose article in Wikipedia was created by a single-purpose account. It smells of promotion, as well. -The Gnome (talk) 13:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure the films he appeared in are "notable" for the purposes of WP:ACTOR; they do have Wikipedia pages but not much else suggesting importance or significance, and I doubt Until Midnight would survive AfD today (though it's probably worth waiting until it's released at this point). power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails NACTOR and GNG. Quis separabit? 20:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per above, the subject fails WP:NACTOR.--SamHolt6 (talk) 23:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.