Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Hansen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Snow (non-admin closure) DavidWS (contribs) 22:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chuck Hansen[edit]
- Chuck Hansen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:BIO ScienceApologist (talk) 02:10, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Satisfies WP:BIO. The article already has a couple of refs, and there's more material out there: [1]. Zagalejo^^^ 02:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A full NYT article, and a Guardian obit? that's notable. DGG (talk) 04:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, agree with DGG. Johnfos (talk) 04:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Passes WP:RS Ecoleetage (talk) 06:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - he would be an expert in his field, which is a highly relevant and researchable field, surely? - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.