Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrystophos Rymannos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chrystophos Rymannos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

suspect hoax article, no reference found... also Chrystophos is a unusual name for someone born before Christ Melaen (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rymannic Palimpsest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- I further nominate the Rymannic Palimpsest, which fails to pass the ancient sniff test. If one falls, so doth the other. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 07:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Diagon (math) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- And further nominate Diagon (math) which mathematically stinks worse than the above. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 07:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 (UTC)

Delete. Childish hoax. Please prove me wrong. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete • Promotional hoax? These articles have the unclean feel of a Dan Brownish pseudo-intellectual put-on. Likewise, prove me wrong with vellum references. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 07:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: After discovery of Diagon (math), my patience is at an end. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 07:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.