Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronological list of men's major golf champions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh 01:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological list of men's major golf champions[edit]

Argument for deletion mostly based on WP:TRIVIA. It seems very trivial to know in chronological order when so-and-so won their first major. Also, is this page really necessary when pages like these (Men's major golf championships and Golfers with most wins in men's major championships) already exist? Each individual major has a list of champions as well. How many pages need to be devoted to lists of major champions? What's next? An alphabetical list? --GoHuskies9904 (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Discriminate, organised, non-trivial. I see no reason to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Lists have different guidelines than articles. A chronological list, to me, is even more valid and more important and more useful for research and historic purposes.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TRIV says to avoid long lists of facts. Well, the golf major championship page already gives who won the majors every year. I agree that this chronological list isn't necessary. Paul, it is not nearly as important as the other two lists. No sports almanac or sports encyclopedia I know of has a list like that. If they were more important they would. --BurpTheBaby (Talk) 21:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - One man's trivia is another man's meat. I am pretty confident that this well organized and styled list is manna to golf nuts. Until someone definitively says what LONG means in a long list of facts, I think this one should stay.--Mike Cline (talk) 14:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see unsigned enthusiastic comment on the discussion page.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.