Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chronicles (book)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The subject does not meet the inclusion guidelines for an article in the encyclopedia. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chronicles (book)[edit]
- Chronicles (book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Series of books with no claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Author not listed at Worldcat or Amazon. Prod contested by article creator without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:12, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no hits on Google, G. Books and G. News either. Alternatively, we can then redirect the resulting redlink to the main Chronicles dab page.--Lenticel (talk) 02:00, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:03, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability; poorly written. JJL (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No notability, probably because it doesn't really exist. Why is it that so many articles on 'fictional' books are so poorly written? Drmies (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.