Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chromatography adsorbent and purification of histidine tagged proteins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chromatography adsorbent and purification of histidine tagged proteins[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research, prod declined. Hairhorn (talk) 01:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Disagree with nom that article is original research; its primary citation is original research, which is a totally different matter. It's also a primary source, though, and contributes nothing to notability. The other cites appear to be simply verifying facts about related processes and also contribute nothing to the notability of this topic. —chaos5023 (talk) 03:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's essentially a rewrite of a primary source, you don't actually have to do your own research (or anything original) to qualify as OR. Hairhorn (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm saying is that if it was published somewhere else, it's not OR for Wikipedia purposes. —chaos5023 (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you say so. Most OR pages have some refs, but they're usually synthesis of some sort. Hairhorn (talk) 13:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. This one seems to be a straight re-presentation of the work in its primary citation, though. —chaos5023 (talk) 15:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete until disinterested secondary sources confirm notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.