Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Mouroukis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Szzuk's assessment of the sources is persuasive and unrebutted. Sandstein 10:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christos Mouroukis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources on him or his films. Fails WP:GNG. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 00:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as has coverage in reliable sources books coverage as already referenced in the article, has produced a number of award winning short films, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I translated the refs and 3 of them link to "add to cart buy me", the fourth and last ref is a humdrum Q&A. Google does show he is an author but google isn't showing enough sigcov and I can only deem this an advert. If this ends keep/no consensus those refs need deleting. Szzuk (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.