Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Suprun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Suprun[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suprun is notable solely for having been a presidential elector, a role that is adequately covered at Faithless electors in the United States presidential election, 2016 E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While he did get a bit of media coverage for his electoral college action, that just makes him a WP:BLP1E. He doesn't need a standalone biography for this; a brief mention in the concept article on faithless electors is all that's actually warranted. Bearcat (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My biggest problem with this article is it leaves hanging a serious BLP issue about a resume claim. This has not been settled in the ensuing 3 months because he is not a public figure and no one cares any more, so it is essentially a BLP violation to have an article on him. Enough can be said about him in the concept article without problematic BLP issues coming up.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.