Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Isak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is consensus that the artices in the current state do not demonstrate ntability of the individuals involved and have to be deleted. The persons may very well be notable, and the articles can be recreated provided they satisfy the notability criteria.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Isak[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These individuals do not appear to pass WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Also included in this nomination:

Christopher Isak
David Maldow
Sean Wilder
Stephanie Watson
Hyoun Park

(Please feel free to add any similar articles to this nomination, in case I've missed any.) ‑Scottywong | babble _ 00:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Full Support: Per nom. --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 00:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as claim to fame comes from a "curated list" "influential people," which is hardly a reliable source. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NPEOPLE. ///EuroCarGT 01:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Even after looking at Isak's "About me" page, I can't figure out what exactly he does. I couldn't find any reliable sources for any of these people. Fails WP:BIO, and how. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As Hyoun Park, I know all of these people. Whether any of us are famous enough to be in Wikipedia is up for debate and I'd be the first to agree that the current stub for my name (which I had no role in creating) is not up to snuff, but the people listed here are all experts in unified communications and enterprise telephony who are hired by enterprise companies and vendors to help with strategy and product development. Although we're famous in our own sphere, Wikipedia doesn't typically list even the most influential of industry analysts, which typically means that people researching enterprise technology topics on Wikipedia cannot find any listed experts on this site. I would actually argue that I'm better known for enterprise mobility as the first to quantify the costs of BYOD as a third-party, for my work with telepresence robots where I advised many of the key players in the market, and my work as a Big Data influencer on social media, but my work in telecom expense management, videoconferencing, and unified communications has also been significant over the last six years since I have about 50 primary published reports in those areas between my work at the Aberdeen Group and Nucleus Research. hyounpark (talk) 5:24, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.