Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Fletcher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge merged content not already covered into Pippa Ross and left this article as redirect to same. Gnangarra 10:41, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Christopher Fletcher[edit]
- Christopher Fletcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
As stated in article: "Throughout his time on the show, Christopher wasn't given very many storylines and only appeared periodically." - non-notable per WP:FICT. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources indicating real world significance. Jay32183 05:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Home and Away. Sources establishing notability outside the show itself will be difficult to find. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 22:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Pippa Ross. Provides more scope for giving details of one character who is intrinsically linked to Pippa, yet was a minor consideration to the whole series.Garrie 22:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per WP:FICT. Minor characters are either treated in the main article or in a separate list of minor characters. Assize 12:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- merge to Home and Away or Pippa Ross; no incoming links (yet) and few web hits. Note that I have just now notified the Conquistador2k6 (talk · contribs) of this Afd. John Vandenberg 13:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, as per above, I guess. A pretty minor character, all things considered. Lankiveil 10:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.