Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Blake Johnson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Blake Johnson[edit]

Christopher Blake Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobio of filmmaker and musician not yet notable per WP:FILMMAKER or WP:MUSICBIO. The band article Third Awakening was deleted six years ago in another AFD, and I can't see how they've become more notable since. His films so far have been shorts, and don't appear to have won any awards or similar notability per WP:NF. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. OnionRing (talk) 05:22, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Honestly, I can't find anything about him. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:10, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I think the source that is provided is a student newspaper [1]. If so, it's an unsuitable source per criterion 1 for WP:MUSICBIO. Anyway, that article is not about the subject that is being discussed here (just passing mentions as a member of a band). The article doesn't say why the subject is notable. I performed several Google searches, and unless I made a mistake, there's nothing in reliable sources. Dontreader (talk) 07:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete neither his directing of films nor his being a member of a ban have brought him to the level of being notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.